Published on

September 29, 2026

Last updated on

September 29, 2026

6 China Infant Formula Labeling Mistakes Manufacturers Keep Making

China’s infant formula market is enormous, and its labeling rules are unforgiving. For international brands, a seemingly minor packaging change can create regulatory delays, filing obligations, or costly rework.

Does changing an expiry date require reopening your formula registration with SAMR? Can packaging colors be used to signal premium imported milk? What happens when production moves to another facility within the same corporate group?

Here are six common labeling mistakes manufacturers should avoid, and what to check before artwork goes to print. Or, for support with label compliance, formula registration and filing, and end-to-end regulatory assessments for infant formula products in China, contact Cisema today.

The China Infant Formula Labeling Framework

Before looking at the common mistakes, it is important to distinguish three separate compliance requirements. They overlap, but they are not interchangeable:

  • Formula Registration (配方注册): Infant formula milk powder product formulas must be registered with SAMR. Labels and instructions relating to the product formula must be consistent with the registered information.
  • Label compliance: Covers the information and presentation required on the packaging. Labels must comply with the Food Safety Law, applicable food safety standards such as GB 7718, infant formula requirements, and SAMR's infant formula labeling rules. The label must also be consistent with the registered formula where it refers to the product formula.
  • Label filing (标签备案): Under Article 81 of the Food Safety Law, infant formula food producers must file specified matters, including labels, with the provincial-level food safety regulator.

In practice, every proposed artwork change should therefore pass three checks:

  • Does it change anything covered by the registered formula?
  • Does the revised artwork comply with the applicable labeling requirements?
  • Does the change trigger a new or updated filing?

Keeping these questions separate helps avoid both unnecessary registration amendments and missed filing obligations.

Mistake 1: Treating Every Label Change as a Registration Amendment

A common misconception is that any change to approved packaging automatically requires a formal amendment to the SAMR formula registration.

The Reality: Certain adjustments — including production and expiry date markings, allergen statements, and milk-source labeling — do not require a registration amendment when they do not affect the consistency of the registered formula. However, the revised label must still be filed with the provincial market regulator as required, and the label used on the market must remain consistent with the registered and filed information.

Before revising artwork, determine separately whether the change affects the registered formula and whether it triggers a label-filing requirement.

Mistake 2: Omitting the Mandatory Milk Allergen Statement

Because infant formula is commonly milk-based, manufacturers may assume the presence of milk is obvious and does not need a separate allergen statement.

The Reality: Infant formula labels must comply with the allergen declaration requirements of GB 7718. The label should state:

“本产品含有乳成分” 
“This product contains milk ingredients.”

The statement should appear in a position close to the ingredient list.

Mistake 3: Putting Production and Expiry Dates Wherever They Fit

Design teams may treat date markings as a layout issue: if the dates are visible and readable, the placement should be fine.

Not necessarily.

The Reality: For infant formula, production and expiry dates must be marked in an independent area of the packaging and presented in year/month/day order.

If that independent area is not on the Principal Display Panel (PDP), the PDP must include:

“见包装物某部位” 
“See [location] on package.”

This directs consumers to where the dates are printed.

Review date format, location, and any required directional wording as part of regulatory artwork approval, not just design approval.

Mistake 4: Using Packaging Design to Communicate Milk Origin

Want to distinguish products by milk source? Changing the can color, lid, container shape, or other visual elements may seem like an easy solution.

The Reality: Where a product makes a claim about the source of raw milk or milk powder, the label must clearly identify the country of origin or specific place of origin.

Products from the same enterprise with the same formula should have consistent label content, format, and color. A milk-source distinction should therefore be stated explicitly rather than left for consumers to infer from packaging design. For products with organic certification, the organic status may be indicated through text or a certification mark on a non-PDP, with the relevant certification documentation submitted during registration or registration change.

Put milk-source claims in words. Do not rely on color, lid design, can shape, or other packaging cues to distinguish milk sources for the same enterprise and formula.

Mistake 5: Listing Only the Brand Owner When Production Moves

What happens when a formula is manufactured by another company within the same corporate group? A common mistake is leaving the brand owner or formula registration holder on the label while failing to identify the entity actually producing the product.

The Reality: Where production is transferred to another controlling subsidiary or the group’s parent company, the arrangement must be reported to SAMR and undergo the required public announcement process.

The label must then clearly identify the actual producer and production address. These details must be readily identifiable and must match the producer's name and address on the relevant Food Production License.

Mistake 6: Automatically Withdrawing Existing Inventory When Rules Change

New labeling requirements can trigger an understandable reaction: pull everything produced under the old rules.

But that is not always necessary.

The Reality: For infant formula manufactured before implementation of the Food Labeling Supervision and Administration Measures (March 16, 2027), products may continue to be sold through their expiry date if their labeling does not violate prohibited provisions.

However, products whose labeling violates a prohibition in the applicable regulations cannot continue to be sold.

Therefore, the correct approach is not to withdraw legacy inventory automatically. Instead, assess existing stock against the applicable transition rules and prohibited labeling provisions before deciding whether withdrawal or relabeling is required.

China Infant Formula Labeling: A Quick Compliance Audit

Before approving your next packaging run, check these six points:

Check Item Requirement
Registration and filing Confirm whether the label change affects the registered formula. If not, determine whether the revised label must be filed with the provincial market regulation authority.
Allergen statement Confirm that “本产品含有乳成分” appears in the appropriate position near the ingredient list.
Date marking Confirm that production and expiry dates are shown in year/month/day order and in an independent area. If the area is not on the PDP, include “见包装物某部位” on the PDP.
Milk-source claims Confirm that milk-source claims state the country or specific place of origin and are not communicated solely through packaging colors, shapes, or other design elements.
Actual producer If production has moved within the corporate group, confirm whether it has been reported to SAMR and publicly announced, and confirm that the label identifies the actual producer and production address, matching the Food Production License.
Existing inventory For products manufactured before the Food Labeling Supervision and Administration Measures took effect, confirm that the labeling does not violate applicable prohibitions and that the products meet the relevant transitional requirements.

Final Thoughts: Getting China Infant Formula Labeling Right

China infant formula compliance requires more than checking whether packaging “looks right.” Manufacturers need to align registered information, label content, filing requirements, production details, and applicable transitional rules.

The challenge is that these requirements do not operate in isolation. A change that looks purely editorial to a marketing or packaging team can have implications for registration consistency, provincial filing, production information, or existing inventory. SAMR's latest labeling guidance makes this distinction particularly important as manufacturers prepare for the new labeling requirements taking effect in 2027.

From comprehensive label and artwork reviews to regulatory gap analysis and formula update assessments, through to infant formula registration and label filing, Cisema helps manufacturers assess proposed changes and keep their China labeling strategy aligned with current requirements.

To discuss your China infant formula labeling and registration requirements, contact Cisema today.

Further information

Explore Cisema’s services for health food registration in China.

Regulatory References

Connect with Cisema

With more than 20 years of experience and a team of over 100 specialists, Cisema helps global companies achieve compliance across Asia Pacific with confidence and accelerate market entry.

Talk to an Expert
Explore Whitepapers

Stay Informed with Monthly News and Analysis

Stay informed with the latest regulatory changes, expert insights, and market opportunities across APAC, delivered straight to your inbox.

Sign Up for Newsletter

Contact Our Consultants & Discover How We Can Support You

Let Cisema help turn your plans into reality.

Request Proposal